yes AndreJ,
I think that 16F62x is my "future" pic for a cheap datalogger solution. I
have read the specs. and a lot of mail in piclist about this chip: I think
taht is a good choice for an "enty-level" logger.
Obviosly, a 16F87xx  will be a better choice for datalogging (A/D), but at
the moment I want a simpler
(and cheaper) unit that take only one, max. two type of measure.
The only doubt I have, using a 32 Khz unit, is a lowered capability in
frequency measure: or I'm wrong?

Bye
Marco




----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Jancura" <andy_jancura@HOTMAIL.COM>
To: <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: 8 febbraio, 2002 11.18
Subject: Re: [EE]: 16F84 Datalogger - current consumption


> Hello Marco,
>
> I don't known if you must use the 16F84. If no, then change it for 16F627
> (pin compatible). You have then the possibility to run it in INTRC mode
with
> two possible speeds of 4MHz and 37kHz. When this is not possible, you can
> just connect another 32kHz crystal the chip and make the timming based on
> the timer1 counter.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Andrej
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
> ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.