James Hillman wrote:

> Is there any reason why you can't do what I have done below ? This is based
> on a write routine I wrote last week. I haven't had any problems with it,
> but maybe I've been lucky ??
>
> Instead of polling PIR1,EEIF you poll EECON1,WR which is cleared (according
> to data sheet DS40300B) at the completion of the write cycle. This saves a
> couple of bank switches and clearing of EEIF bit instructions.


None at all. That's the method I normally use for the reasons you
mention.

I reserve the EEIF flag for use with interrupt routines, which is what
it is there for.

--
Best regards

Tony

mICros
http://www.bubblesoftonline.com
mailto:sales@bubblesoftonline.com

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu