On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:50:46AM -0800, Andre Abelian wrote:
> Why F877 use 18cxxx has more power 32 level stack and
> Lot more I started using 18c242 I love it.

Some problems which I think has been address in this thread.

1) Not enough pins. He'd have to step up to an 18C442
2) Not internally bootloadable.
3) Development environment?

BAJ
>
> Andre Abelian
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi all
> > We are all great fans of the pic, I'm trying to use the
> > PIC16F877 for a
> > project, my boss is forcing me to use 8051, I need 30 I/O lines
> > including 2 serial ports and eeprom space where my F877 fits
> > perfectly.
> > I searched through most of the 8051 family but couldn't do it with a
> > single chip.
> > He argues that the pic has awkward architecture with small memory map
> > and poor support for compilers. Looking at the F877 I think it's the
> > opposite, it has large memory and a great architecture and lots of
> > peripherals and 2 fast, there are also lots of good compilers around.
> > Any suggestions, comments, feedback welcome.
> > thanx
> >
> > --
> > http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
> > ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
> ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
> email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body
>

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body