Hi,
Roman Black wrote:
>So nobody is interestd in my EE-Draw program now?

Incorrect, atleast I am :)
Not taking anything away from anyone, this is just my
personal preference.

>It was designed to be smaller and faster than any
>windows app, suitable for emailing both file and
>the program itself. I was happy to add whatever

This is something most people seem to forget nowdays,
I have frequent discussion with both customers and
within the company anout this issue.
Standalone, small, fast mmmm I guess Microsoft has taken the
better part of them and got them used to 100Mb+ installs,
100's of dll's and hourglass googling :)

>features people wanted to make the perfect circuit
>sketch pad but everyone prefers Al's 2-hour drag and
>drop windows app over a small maximum performance
>custom written application? I expected more from
>piclisters.

Did you ? :) I'm an windows user I still would vote for an
small fast one file solution anyday of the week.
Did you say libraries ?

>-Roman

BTW Roman, I see little use for full chips in the library,
normally when making an ascii schematics it should be small
and cover the essentials. An ascii drawing with oscillator,
vdd, vss etc would just tend to be 'clogged' ( unless ofcource
it's an pic-controlling-power circuit ). Perhaps a stripped down
small number of pins, versitile chip is better ( i.e. you only
show the pins crucial for the circuit ), just a thought.

Anyway, great stuff from all,

/Tony

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body