This means, if you need a delay for each call tree,
that the code expands quite rapidly.
Is it ???

grtz,

Simon


 --- Dag Bakken <dag@c74.no> wrote: > This is a quite
straight forward problem.  If you
> are executing the
> delay called from the main() call-tree when you
> receive an interrupt,
> and then again call the delay from the ISR, the
> original local
> variables in the delay will be corrupted and the
> delay will be wrong
> when you exit the ISR.  This is a problem since CC5X
> does not generate
> a software stack.  A delay routine shouldn't be too
> big, so a quick
> and dirty way of doing it can be to implement one
> delay routine for
> each call-tree.
>
> Dag S
>


>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.