Roman,
    Let me see if I have this right. I adjust the period until I get bit
change in the counter. However the pulse width will be constant (actually a
very very slowly changing - to the extent of being constant) so effectively
changing the period will only change duty cycle. Maybe I'm being obtuse but
I can't see how this will improve the resolution if I'm running with a
system clock of 1uS. Initially I thought you were suggesting a the use of
dither to get the resolution, but as far as I remember dither will help
resolve and additional 1/2LSB which will gain only 500uS. For the
application I would really need 250nS resolution on the width of the pulse.

I'll give what I was proposing a shot and I'll let you know how it gets on.

Slan

John

***************************************************************
John.Walshe@inpactmicro.com

INPACT MICROELECTRONICS (Irl) Ltd
21A Pouladuff Road,
Cork,
Ireland,

Tel: +353 21 4318296
Fax: +353 21 4318980

WWW.INPACTMICRO.COM
***************************************************************

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.