I don't think there will be any problems with DC over the contacts. You should have a good look at http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/af/index.html Then you will see that not only you plan to power RS485 nodes (and I plan to power CAN Nodes) over CAT5 cable: The highly official IEEE commitee is developing a standard to power network nodes on the ethernet (!) through CAT5 cable. Of course fully downward compatible... And they use DC to do it... Florian Martin Peach wrote: > > I thought of doing the same kind of thing. There are plenty of extra wires > in Cat5 cable. The only issue I could think of is possible corrosion of > dissimilar metal contacts using DC, so I was leaning to towards low-voltage > AC. The RJ-45 jacks are usually rated in amperes so there would be no > problem with current-carrying capacity. Also daisy-chaining means that a > failure anywhere brings down everything beyond the fault. > > /\/\/\/*=Martin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kenneth Lumia" > To: > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:21 PM > Subject: [EE]: How can I power a small RS485 network? > > > Hello, > > > > I need the lists knowledge of RS485 to answer a hopefully simple > question - > > can I use extra pairs in a Cat5 cable to power several RS485 nodes? More > > details below (long). > > > > I'm creating a small RS485 network in my home to monitor temperatures, > > humidity, water leaks and a few security sensors (using PICs of course). > > The nodes are relatively simple, however I am somewhat at a loss on > > how to power them. The simplest solution is of course a wall wart on > > each node, however I want the nodes to look "clean", that is no wires > > hanging outside the walls, very similar to an air conditioning thermostat > > housing. I plan to run a daisy-chain of Cat5 cable to each node. > > Now the question. Has anyone ever run power to RS485 nodes on > > unused pairs of Cat5 cable? Is this a no-no? The power requirements are > > relatively low, < 100mA each node during transmission, maybe > > 10 - 20 mA at other times, x 6 to 8 nodes. > > > > I'm thinking a small supply, either AC or preferably DC (to reduce parts > > count on each node) at the start of the cable is a possible solution, > i.e., > > a DC supply of sufficient voltage to cover power losses, L di/dt, etc., > > with a LDO regulator at each node. Is this poor design Vcm wise, etc? > > > > I've seen many RS485 designs use 100 ohm resistors in series with the > ground > > connection to limit common mode current. Are they really needed on a > > "small" installation (300 feet, internal to one building). If needed, > they > > sort of mess up the idea of using DC. > > > > Any thoughts, suggestions? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Ken > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList > > mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu > > > > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList > mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu -- http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads