On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:46:01 +1200, Steve Baldwin  wrote:

>> >Hi, I want to change over to using the '628
>> I don't know about the 'being plain dumb' part :=3D) but, for some
>> reason, I missed it when I was looking for it too.
>
>It must be that particular device. Last night I spent ages trying to
>find the PICC include file for it and it was there all the time. Now I
>just have to find why the code that fits into a '622 won't fit in the
>'628.
>

I think it has to do with scanning through the file list and expecting
to find it right after the number '622. But that one's the 16*C*622
and the 16*F*628 is a bit further down in the list.

The 622 and 628 are both listed as having 2K (x14) program space.
Could you possibly  have different macro expansions that are
generating more code for the 628 than the 622?

Regards, Bob

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body