Hmmm ... it seems that most of the ASSUMPTIONS assumed below in the comparison of the Ginger to a bicycle assume a human being in near perfect physical shape (are you going to live forever at your current physical capacity Roman?) AND operated in an environ free from objects a necessary distance and 'free space' ahead of it as is normally required to operate a bike (a bike and rider DO NOT BALANCE standing still) making the bicycle ONLY suitable for unrestricted *outside* use. Ginger, however (until it's power source runs down), may operate in a stationary 'static' manner which a bicycle is unable to do - and in relatively tight quarters ... Two entirely different vehicles with completely different missions and requirements/demands on it's operator. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roman Black" To: Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:21 AM Subject: Re: [OT]: Did someone think? > Nice post Doug, you can rely on someone that rides > existing 2-wheel transport to evaluate new 2-wheel > transport ideas I reckon. :o) > > Is Ginger going to revolutionise transport?? > Lets see: > * Bicycle is 10x cheaper. > * bike is faster > * bike uses no electricity > * bike can go up/down steeper grades > * bikes have good suspension these days > * bike better off road > * bike is a lot better under brakes!! > * bike is light (carry up stairs?) > * electric bike is more efficient > (most efficient electric vehicle on the > planet according to Calif EV magazine) > * bike has a SEAT (why stand to travel?) > * bike is skinnier, better in traffic > > This Ginger technology is a fairly poor form of > human transport, an electric skateboard > (you can buy them) is easier to carry, faster, > smaller, and better standing transport on > concrete at least. > > But I do see a use for this concept for robots, > being able to stand tall and turn on axis. > -Roman > > > Douglas Butler wrote: > > > > Sure I would like a small electric scooter, but I don't see a real > > advantage to Ginger versus a battery powered Razor. Sure Ginger can > > balance at low speed, but I don't need a machine to do that! They say > > it can go 12 or 18 mph, but how well does it corner at those speeds? If > > you are zipping down the sidewalk and a dog runs out in front of you, > > you are still going to get a face full of gravel. As far as I can see > > Ginger in a quick stop would have to accelerate to get your feet out in > > front of you so you could the decelerate at even a fraction of a G. > > That would feel pretty scary, and if your knees buckle, it's all over. > > > > Nice toy, but Transportation Revolution? No way! > > > > Sherpa Doug > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList > mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu > > -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu