Nice post Doug, you can rely on someone that rides
existing 2-wheel transport to evaluate new 2-wheel
transport ideas I reckon. :o)

Is Ginger going to revolutionise transport??
Lets see:
* Bicycle is 10x cheaper.
* bike is faster
* bike uses no electricity
* bike can go up/down steeper grades
* bikes have good suspension these days
* bike better off road
* bike is a lot better under brakes!!
* bike is light (carry up stairs?)
* electric bike is more efficient
(most efficient electric vehicle on the
planet according to Calif EV magazine)
* bike has a SEAT (why stand to travel?)
* bike is skinnier, better in traffic

This Ginger technology is a fairly poor form of
human transport, an electric skateboard
(you can buy them) is easier to carry, faster,
smaller, and better standing transport on
concrete at least.

But I do see a use for this concept for robots,
being able to stand tall and turn on axis.
-Roman


Douglas Butler wrote:
>
> Sure I would like a small electric scooter, but I don't see a real
> advantage to Ginger versus a battery powered Razor.  Sure Ginger can
> balance at low speed, but I don't need a machine to do that!  They say
> it can go 12 or 18 mph, but how well does it corner at those speeds?  If
> you are zipping down the sidewalk and a dog runs out in front of you,
> you are still going to get a face full of gravel.  As far as I can see
> Ginger in a quick stop would have to accelerate to get your feet out in
> front of you so you could the decelerate at even a fraction of a G.
> That would feel pretty scary, and if your knees buckle, it's all over.
>
> Nice toy, but Transportation Revolution?  No way!
>
> Sherpa Doug

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu