Mark Samuels wrote:
>
> The FAT isn't really that tough, it's just deciphering the spec, and a LOT
> of overhead in the PIC.  I've got existing assembly code which will read
> the data of a file, given the actual filename and direcory path stored as
> strings in a buffer.  Just haven't had time lately to implement the writing
> side of things.

Disclaimer: I haven't looked at the contest rules.

Does the file system have to be FAT? There are other formats that might be
simpler to implement. Could you invent your own, simpler, format?

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body