"Scott F. Touchton" schrieb: > > I don't think you would find me a receptive business partner.... > > Here is where I get confused in the conversation... a single car has the > energy of 1/2 mv^2. Two cars of identical mass have the combined energy of > mv^2. > > So, if one is traveling towards the other, they each impart 1/2mv^2 to the > total impact. > After this, they don't move. so energy==0 > Now, if you bring in the relative part, one car standing still and the > other traveling at 2V, now the energy is 2mv^2 (not the earlier assumption > of mv^2). After this, both move with 75 kph (1V), so half of the doubled energy is still there.....no nobel prize for physics..... ;-( Greets Jochen Feldhaar > > I am totally perplexed in this right now.. I would gather that one > assumption is wrong (of course, or I made a stupid math error). > > Please find it in your heart to enlighten me... I actually lost sleep over > this!! > > Scott > > Bob Ammerman > LPHIA.NET> cc: > Sent by: pic Subject: Re: [ot]: how does a radar detector work? > microcontrolle > r discussion > list > A.MIT.EDU> > > 11/07/01 11:54 > PM > Please respond > to pic > microcontrolle > r discussion > list > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott F. Touchton" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 6:12 AM > Subject: Re: [ot]: how does a radar detector work? > > > Energy is relative to velocity and mass. So... one car traveling at > 75mph > > will impart energy equating to the square of its velocity and mass. If > you > > hit another car traveling towards you at 75mph, it is the same as hitting > a > > fixed object at the relative speed, 150mph. Much more energy... I was > > wrong about the twice part, it is a squared relationship. So you have 4 > > times the energy being imparted onto both cars (so each will see twice as > > much if the masses are the same). > > > > Scott F. Touchton > > 1550 Engineering Manager > > JDS Uniphase > > Again, where does this energy come from? If you can tell me, I'd like to go > into business with you selling perpetual motion machines. > > Bob Ammerman > RAm Systems > > > > > > > Gerhard > > Fiedler To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU > > > O.COM.BR> Subject: Re: [ot]: how does > a > radar detector work? > > Sent by: pic > > microcontrolle > > r discussion > > list > > > A.MIT.EDU> > > > > > > 11/06/01 10:29 > > AM > > Please respond > > to pic > > microcontrolle > > r discussion > > list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 09:54 11/06/2001 -0500, Scott F. Touchton wrote: > > >I have to disagree with you... you have approximately twice as much > energy > > >being absorbed by the cars. > > > > Twice as much by _two_ cars... :) If you run one car into a completely > > (ideally) stiff wall, it's the energy of one car absorbed by one car, > > because the stiff wall doesn't absorb anything, so in this two cases, > every > > car absorbes the same energy, no matter whether it's one car against a > wall > > or two cars against each other. (A different thing is a car against a > > standing car.) > > > > ge > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! > > email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList > > mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu > > > > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList > mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: > [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads -- http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads