Oh, you all can't be serious!  It took me all of 60 seconds to find this
on Microchip's site:

http://www.microchip.com/1010/overview/qualreli/relidata/index.htm

Would nothing there be helpful?

Dale
--
Hallo, this is Linus Torvalds and I pronounce Linux as Leennuks.
Hallo, this is Bill Gates and I pronounce 'crap' as 'Windows'.

On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Gerhard Fiedler wrote:

> At 13:37 11/05/2001 -0800, Dave King wrote:
> >Does anyone know what the mtbf rating is for any of the pics?
> >I've rummaged around the Microchip site but couldn't find a
> >mtbf number.
> >
> >[...]
> >I'm curious to see which way everyone would go with this. The main
> >criteria are reliability and production cost. And each way has its merits.
>
> Interesting question -- unluckily I don't have a clue about mtbf numbers
> for PICs. My guess would be though that the discrete logic is way more
> reliable. It also seems that production cost is not higher -- leaving the
> lower flexibility as sole disadvantage. If your main criteria are
> reliability and production cost, I'd probably go with discrete logic.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.