At 08:34 PM 10/23/01 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "David VanHorn" > > I would expect that C should be more efficient on the AVR, as it seems >well > > designed for it, but I'm not a "C guy" yet. Too busy making a living in > > assembler. :) > > >Dave, if you read the stuff from atmel (I know we assembler guys do not read >the junk on C as we never use it) they say the AVR was designed and >instructions were implemented or left out to make the AVR better under C, in >fact the AVR was designed for C :o) I know, but I can't really evaluate the truth of it, since I'm not a C guy. What they say seems reasonable though. -- Dave's Engineering Page: http://www.dvanhorn.org Got a need to read Bar codes? http://www.barcodechip.com Bi-directional read of UPC-A, UPC-E, EAN-8, EAN-13, JAN, and Bookland, with two or five digit supplemental codes, in an 8 pin chip, with NO external parts. -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu