Allen Mahurin wrote:
>
>I didn't ignore the warning ... just didn't know
>exactly what it meant.  And since the lower portion of
>the address is all I was concerned with (or o I would
>think), it seems like it would be OK.  My next step is
>to find and memorize what each warning message means
>(I've already been looking over error messages).
>

Sorry, my response may have sounded a bit more harsh than I meant it to be.
:=)

There's probably no need to memorize what each warning means (unless you get
a *lot* of warnings). Just be aware that the assembler is telling you that
you're doing something that it thinks is weird.

I may be paranoid about warnings, but I make it my standard practice to
avoid having any warnings at all. I was taught many years ago (more than I
think I'd care to admit to) that warnings should be treated as if they were
errors.

I've never been comfortable with the 'Just ignore it, it's only a warning.'
approach. If you're used to getting a dozen warnings every time you assemble
your code, are you really likely to notice when one new warning appears?
Probably not.

Regards, Bob



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu