This is just an example of a difference of opinion.

Many say "Unless you can prove beyond any doubt (nevermind reasonable
doubt), I will continue to believe that it didn't happen."

Whereas others believe that the burden of proof lies with the person
trying to disprove the act, sort of an "innocent 'till proven guilty" deal.

I'd say that NASA has more than proven, beyond reasonable doubt, that
they landed on the moon.  The burden of proof to disprove should now lie
with the naysayers.  Rather than saying, "Well, if you fulfill these
conditions, then they show that it /could/ have been faked."  They have
yet to show, however, that it /was/ faked.  ie, their evidence is
substantially weaker than NASA's, and is based on theories and what-if
scenarios.

I'd say, let lying dogs sleep... er, is it the other way around?  I'm
confused so easily...

-Adam

Randy A. wrote:

>There are some people that still think the earth is flat, they are called the
>Flat Earth Society.  You just can't convince some people.
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu