My little bit .... some of you are defending it about the amount of people involved in the whole mission etc ....about how they all could not be on a conspiracy without something slipping out ... But when those guys got high they took a trip around the moon .... and ... - 0. easily could have come back WITHOUT landing. So we should concentrate on that bit and all the logistics that go with it: a) Therefore it doesn't need THAT many people to be on it.( all the real technology -read evidence - were neccesary for up to orbitting Moon ) ..... ) add more here , you nuts and my speculations and disbeliefs : -1. how many more astronauts have been through such radiation and anything as prolonged since ? -2.Have they ( all cosmosnauts particulary ) any kids since ? funny looking ? have any of their kids all and only two nuts ? or have they (as_t's) all their intact ? -3. despite the reports ( I have not yet examined the EvidEncE of both fact , theory and practical science of the time ) I find it hard to believe that we could sucessfully send 3 guys a zillion miles , ask them to SUCESSFULLY land a pod on the moon , get out in thinner protection to more radiation etc.and to SUCESSFULLY take off again ( weren't we landing in the sea during that period ? ... I know ... Gravity is much weaker on moon ... etc). Then to Sucessfully to mate with the mothership to transfer our two guys back with the third manning the main thingy all by himself and then to SUCESSFULLY ( last time I promise ) get back towards earth and then landing to the adoration of millions of earthlings. -4. Three guys ? why not four ? or five ? whos to fully know... not a thousand people need do. HOT one - Maybe we left someone behind who Really did land/crash on the moon. (don't shoot this one with these someones would be missed by someone or that they wouldn't give up their lives or the audio evidence on board) -5. Everyweek we see our heroes being blasted off towards the moon a lot. But I never have seen Wile Coyote , daffy duck , Timon , Phumba , the cow etc EVER coming back. Okay it boils down to my disbelief without looking at any evidence. A NASA conspiracy cannot be discounted as per point 0. And point 2 , together with that PIC's came out only in the 80's is my PROOF. However , lets discuss points 0 and 4 ( ... er this is just a joke ... I am a crank ... see my tin foil hat ... NASA MIB's do not try to trace me as I have been just messing around ) SUCESSFULLY ;-) > http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: > [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads and etc SUCESSFULLY ;-) -- http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body