I think he was saying that now that his code is stable, and he wants to d=
o
production parts, can he replace the 16C74 for the 16F74 that he was doin=
g
prototyping with? He no longer needs to re-burn code, but he does need to=
 be
sure that they are electrically and functionally compatible, minus the
re-programmability functionality.

--Ian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Niklas Wennerstrand" <niklas.wennerstrand@TELIA.COM>
To: <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:47 AM
Subject: [PIC]: Equivalent to F74?


> 16F74 is a FLASH part that can be reprogram with your programmer.
> 16C74 is a OTP One Time Programable part.
> Regards
> Niklas
>
>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Fr=E5n: pic microcontroller discussion list [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.=
EDU]
> F=F6r SkinTech
> Skickat:        den 30 augusti 2001 13:47
> Till:   PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> =C4mne: [PIC]:   Equivalent to F74?
>
> Re-posted with correct tag, sorry...
>
>
>  Hello to all,
>
>  I have this project developed with a 16F74. Now that I go for a small
>  series, could I use the 16C74(A), which I think is more easily availab=
le
> and
>  maybe cheaper. As far as I can see on the data sheets they are
functionally
>  equivalent. The F74 data sheet also mentions 'pin-compatible to C74A',
but
> I
>  just want to make sure they are functionally equivalent as well.
>  Any inputs highly appreciated!
>
>  Jan Didden.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads