> > There is one major problem with the FET used as shown. This is an > N-Channel > > device > > No it's not. I've got the spec sheet from IR right in front of me. I don't > know where you got this from. Aaaagh! - you're no doubt correct - my mistake. I thought I'd downloaded the datasheet but when I went back and looked just now I find it's for the IRF3205 - I must have written down the wrong number and also I suppose the price refers to that too. Nice FET though :-). If yours is a P Channel then all is well. > > Buck converters are usually best run in continuous current mode ... > I see nothing inherent to buck converters to support that statement. Continuous and discontinuous modes are quite different in the relationship between input and output voltages. The continuous mode can be considered as a PWM waveform filtered by the output LC filter. The discontinuous mode adds extra terms for frequency of switching and inductance in the Vin/Vout relationship. Swapping between modes in one design is generally ill advised as design criteria for both are hard to meet simultaneously. Arguably the continuous mode is most desirable. That said, any buck converter will be forced to run in discontinuous mode under a light enough load and this may well be acceptable for a normally continuous mode design . Texas Instruments report SLVA057, "Understanding Buck Power Stages in Switchmode Power Supplies" March 1999 gives a good overview of the two modes and their differences. They note - "It should be noted that the buck power stage is rarely operated in discontinuous mode in normal situations, but discontinuous conduction mode will occur anytime the load current is below the critical level." This of course doesn't mean you shouldn't design a discontinuous mode version if there are major advantages in doing so. regards Russell McMahon -- http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads