At 11:24 AM 8/7/01 +1000, you wrote:
>Olin Lathrop wrote:
>
>> Therefore, for most cases, the original code was just fine:
>>
>>     bsf   portb, clock_bit
>>     bcf   portb, clock_bit
>
>
>Probably so, but even Microchip suggest something like....
>
>     bsf   portb, clock_bit
>     nop
>     bcf   portb, clock_bit
>

This only adds in another 0.2 usec with a 20 mhz xtal. Isn't
gonna help a great deal if a good-sized cap is hanging on the
pin.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics