***R E S E N D *** due to lack of subject line

 Peter,

 Notice I said "Less likely to pirate it" not 'would not pirate it.

                                              Regards,

                                                Jim


On Fri, 03 August 2001, "Peter L. Peres" wrote:

>
> > And no I don't really have a better
> > idea for protection.   I do know that a lot of the packages I used
> > were so expensive that that was the main reason for the dongle
> > protection.   But it seems to me that if the software didn't cost
> > an arm and a leg in the first place, people would be less likely
> > to pirate it in the second place.  It would be easier for them to
> > just go buy the package.
>
> Oh, those idealistic americans again, dreaming of a world much better than
> it really *is* ;-). Do you realize there are people who will copy things
> just to make sure they have a copy of it even if they have no idea what it
> does ?!
>
> Peter
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
> email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

jim@jpes.com

------- End of forwarded message -------

jim@jpes.com

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body