"Andrew E. Kalman" wrote:

> That's the nice thing about writing an RTOS (or ours, at least). It doesn't do anything outside of ANSI C except for a  wee bit in the context switcher and accommodating interrupt code. So it's eminently portable...
>
> But, as we've found out on many occasions, regression testing is absolutely necessary to uncover various problems relating to the compiler under test. With a good compiler vendor who's interested in improving the quality of their product, the discover bug - report to vendor - bug is fixed cycle isn't too painful.

This is funny: when I reported the bugs that I've found, the Microchip support attendant wrote me a suggestion to try another compiler from someone else !!!

> Regards,
> --
>   ______________________________________
>    Andrew E. Kalman, Ph.D.   aek@pumpkininc.com
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
> ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

Best regards for everyone
Francisco

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body