Bob: I had not considered the impression left on people reading the HEADLINES but not the STORY; you are right, that could definitely present a bad impression. I, in fact was reading the STORY without reading the HEADLINE...it is pretty alarmist! I guess I should have taken the initiative to move the subject off-list earlier. I would hope everyone at least comes away from this with an impression that: 1. TechTools _DOES_ BETA testing rather than 'bug swaps called upgrades' 2. TechTools is responsive to BETA BUG REPORTS. 3. TechTools does not consider BETA BUGs as dirty laundry to be hidden/denied or ignored. Jerry >Well put, Olin. > >If specific issues with a particular development tool aren't of enough >general interest to list members, it may be worth considering additional >topic tags for them. (Otherwise, I'll just continue deleting them.) > >You're right, though, I'm starting to get a bad impression, probably >unfairly as well, just from the volume of posts. > > >Regards, Bob Jerry Merrill jerrym@tech-tools.com http://www.tech-tools.com FAX: (972) 494-5814 VOICE:(972) 272-9392 TechTools PO Box 462101 Garland, TX 75046-2101 Join our PIC discussion list at http://www.tech-tools.com/picsource.htm -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.