Olin Lathrop wrote:
>
>No offense guys, but I don't want to see the PIC list turned into a
>TechTools support list.  I don't know what the admins think of this, but it
>is starting to annoy me.  Don't get me wrong, I think some amount of
>discussing bugs/features of products PIClisters might use is a good thing,
>but this thread has descended into irrelevant details for most of us long
>ago.  It's also not fair to vendors to air their dirty laundry so publicly.
>Yes, I know, all products have bugs and individual cases don't mean
>anything.  However, I haven't been reading the details but am, perhaps
>unfairly, left with "TechTools = bugs" in the back of my mind as a result
>of
>many messages on this subject.
>

Well put, Olin.

If specific issues with a particular development tool aren't of enough
general interest to list members, it may be worth considering additional
topic tags for them. (Otherwise, I'll just continue deleting them.)

You're right, though, I'm starting to get a bad impression, probably
unfairly as well, just from the volume of posts.


Regards, Bob


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.