BobG wrote... >New, Related Question: >Do you have to be more concerned with EMI when you use a switching DC-DC >convert / regulator? =20 Yes, you do; possible interference to sensitive circuits in your own device is always an issue, as are possible radiated and/or conducted emissions that could interfere with other devices. The LT1931 device you linked to below operates around a megahertz, which could cause a lot of interference with nearby radios. >I am considering this linear device >http://www.linear.com/prod/datasheet?datasheet=3D569&product_family=3Dpo= wer >In a nutshell its 5V in, -12V @150ma out. Its overkill for what I need = (2ma >at -12V for an LCD), but the chip is only a couple bucks, and I am = afraid of >discrete components:) It's overkill, and at the very low currents your application requires, it won't be very efficient either. Take a look at the efficiency curve for the "+5V to -12V Inverting Converter" circuit (I assume this is the one you were thinking of); see how the efficiency drops off sharply at low output currents? =46rom what I see on a quick read of the datasheet, it looks like this device was optimized to give high output power in a VERY small circuit footprint; hence, the high operating frequency to make the inductors small. It doesn't seem to be targeted at low current applications. >The data sheet actual has a sample board layout, warning, "If you don't = lay >out your PCB carefully, its not going to work". And they REALLY mean it, too: if you have a layout that doesn't have the right ground topology (i.e., the right arrangement of the current paths in the circuit) the chip won't work. >Is this normal? =20 Unfortunately, yes. >Are switching regulators trickier to work with? =20 Sometimes yes, sometimes not so tricky. At best, they take considerably more care to design with than the trusty ol' 7805 linear regulator. At worst, they are unbelievably nightmarish to design. =46or applications requiring a couple of watts of power, there are many IC switching regulators that are fairly easy to design with. National Semiconductor's "Simple Switcher" chips are the ones I've used most often, and they have the design procedure down to a cookbook approach where you just plug some numbers into a few formulas, look up a few component values in a table, and you're done. Component selection, particularly filter capacitors, is critical, and so is circuit layout; but other than that it's straightforward. =46or applications requiring more power, design becomes progressively more and more difficult as the power increases. Above a few dozen watts, things get tricky; above a few hundred, it becomes "don't try this trick at home". Above a few thousand watts, it gets real scary. =46or lower-power applications, the situation gets even trickier; designing a switching regulator to convert 10 milliwatts at high efficiency can be a real challenge because every piddling little power loss within the circuit has to be minimized. In any case, yes; switching regulators are generally more difficult to design with than linear regulators. >I gather >that a DC-DC convert is similar to a switching regulator; the difference >being that the output of the DC-DC convert will vary with changes in = Vin. Is >that correct? Yes and no. In some cases (such as the LT1931 you cited), the terms are used interchangeably. Here's a suggestion, for whatever it's worth: The easiest way to generate a negative voltage for your LCD bias would be with one of the RS232 interface chips (like a MAX232A) that generate their own + and - RS232 levels using capacitive charge pumps. Just ignore the RS232 transceiver circuits (ground the unused inputs or connect them to Vcc, whichever results in the least current drain) and use only the power section. The efficiency will be a lot better than the LT1931, and so will the price tag. The only drawback is that you won't get a full -12 volts out of it, only around -9V to -10V. Would that be enough? Hope this helps... Dave -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics