I have since then thought about it and I'm trying to do something new, = not just another language I mean there's Jal, C, Basic, etc..why does code have to be written in = text page up and page down.. so I have some really weird ideas on how to continue this, project. = However I just got a job offer and I already have several things on the = back-burner that needs some more attention so it will have to wait for = now. Also, if I was to write a conventional programming language I would = probably ANTLR. Which would remove a lot of the work including parsing the lanugage. Patrik ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "wouter van ooijen & floortje hanneman" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 8:39 PM Subject: Re: [PIC]: Compiler > > I was thinking of writing a compiler for PIC uCs > > so I was curious if you guys think another programming language = would > > be a good idea.. >=20 > Note that that's two statements: I want to create a new language AND I = want > two write a compiler! >=20 > I do not want to discourage you too much, but try to get an idea of = what you > are getting yourself into. My compiler (Jal) is now about 14k lines of = C > (total lines, incl. blanks and comments), but it is still quite = primitive > compared to for instance a full C compiler, does not even come near to > targeting all PICs, and I am still not satisfied with the = optimizations. But > it is fun! >=20 > Maybe you should consider contributing to the SDCC project? >=20 > But if you really want to jump into this we might have some nice talks = about > language architecture, compiler writing, the horrors of efficient PIC = code > generation, avoiding stack use, etc. >=20 > Wouter >=20 > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList > mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu >=20 >=20 -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu