This brings up the question as to whether you are actually refering to "traces" or "airwires"?  If you meant "airwires" the whole time,
then that is a completely different story.  Yes,  the "airwires" would be generated from the schematic to maintain the forward/backward
anotation.

Ann & David Scott wrote:

> Very strange but this is what I found.  The problem is that there are artifacts (stray traces, etc.) on the .brd that I can't get
> rid of.  I finally deleted the .brd file, opened the schematic file and had it create a new .brd file (so now I'll have to relocate
> the components and start over running traces).  But the artifacts were still there!
>
> So, in the schematic I selected all of the circuit (not the frame) and did a copy.  Opened a new schematic file.  Pasted in the
> circuit.  Create a new .brd file.  Artifacts gone.
>
> OK. Next I deleted the new .brd file.  Renamed one of the old .brd files in place of the new one.  Checked it out and now I have my
> .brd as I was working on it but without the artifacts.
>
> So the artifacts were in the schematic file?
>
> DS
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
> ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body