> Ah Ha, now I understand the reason for suggesting the temp switch! I am
> using the tip over switch to monitor a portable application but will not
> need UL approval. Sorry I cannot be a little more specific but there are
> secrecy provisions in place.

I know this is a long shot, but would a cheap accellerometer work in this
application?  We are using some in a project now, and they can be cheaper
than mechanical switches.  Of course they need to be on to work.


********************************************************************
Olin Lathrop, embedded systems consultant in Littleton Massachusetts
(978) 742-9014, olin@embedinc.com, http://www.embedinc.com

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.