What about a computed goto ? I have never used 12 bit CPUs,
but with 14 bit ones, it works :

        ...
        call table      ;w contains the table index
        ...             ;when returning, W contains table(index)

table   addwf   PCL,F
        retlw   '1'
        retlw '2'
        ....

>  -----Mensaje original-----
>  De: pic microcontroller discussion list
>  [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU]En nombre de Roman Black
>  Enviado el: miercoles, 30 de mayo de 2001 17:38
>  Para: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>  Asunto: Re: [PIC]: A table question.
>
>
>  Hi, has anyone done a table-less data table??
>
>  I have run out of room on a 12-core PIC and
>  need a small table.
>
>  I have tried:
>
>          movlw 23        (table data byte)
>          decf count,f
>          skpnz
>          goto table_exit
>          movlw 71        (next data byte)
>          decf count,f
>          skpnz
>          goto table_exit
>
>  But this is 4 bytes per table data byte.
>  Does anyone have a more efficient system?
>
>  I have thought about placing a table in
>  a ram bank, then using FSR to address it as
>  the 16C505 can address any ram with FSR without
>  bank switching. I think this will get me
>  2 bytes rom = 1 table data byte. But it is messy.
>
>  Any suggestions from the PIC masters? :o)
>  -Roman
>
>  --
>  http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
>  email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body