And why can't you use a normal ADDWF PCL,F table?

Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems
(contract development of high performance, high function, low-level
software)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roman Black" <fastvid@EZY.NET.AU>
To: <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [PIC]: A table question.


> Hi, has anyone done a table-less data table??
>
> I have run out of room on a 12-core PIC and
> need a small table.
>
> I have tried:
>
>         movlw 23        (table data byte)
>         decf count,f
>         skpnz
>         goto table_exit
>         movlw 71        (next data byte)
>         decf count,f
>         skpnz
>         goto table_exit
>
> But this is 4 bytes per table data byte.
> Does anyone have a more efficient system?
>
> I have thought about placing a table in
> a ram bank, then using FSR to address it as
> the 16C505 can address any ram with FSR without
> bank switching. I think this will get me
> 2 bytes rom = 1 table data byte. But it is messy.
>
> Any suggestions from the PIC masters? :o)
> -Roman
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
> email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body