But that was my point: PICs aren't different than other processors regarding the stack. Douglas Wood Software Engineer dbwood@kc.rr.com Home of the EPICIS Development System for the PIC and SX http://epicis.piclist.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Drew Vassallo" To: Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 2:59 PM Subject: Re: [PIC]: Stack overflow? Size of stack? > >Other processors don't have stack over(under)run indicators, why should the > >PIC? > > Because they want to be better than "other processors?" I don't know. > > Why are your products different than others in your market? Odd question. > > --Andrew > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > -- > http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! > email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body > > -- http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body