This is getting to be a FAQ too ;)

I use CCS PCM with MPLAB.  Some others swear by Hi-Tech C -- way more
expensive (*8??), I have not tried it.  I've tried a couple of others that
varied from "OK-but-not-great" to "truly sucks".  I've used CCS for 16F84,
'F87x, and a few others with great success -- one of the reasons I like it
is because of the sizeable number of functions either built in or included
in libraries.

Dale

On Mon, 21 May 2001, Paul McClean wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am relatively new to PIC programming, although I have considerable
> computer and electronics experience. I am familiar with assembly programming
> on the PIC16F84 and PIC16F87*, although I would now like to move to a C
> compiler, as my programs get larger and more complicated. I have extensive
> experience with C programming on Linux and DOS, and a little on a Motorola
> 68K test bench.
>
> When I had a quick look, there appears to be a huge number of different
> compilers out there. Which compiler would you recommend, considering I
> require support for at LEAST the two PICS mentioned and preferably for the
> entire range, and I have a limited budget (read student :) ).
>
> I'm currently using a homebrew (David Tait style) programmer, with DOS
> software, and developing using MPLAB. I would like to consider moving to
> Linux as my development platform, if someone could suggest a C compiler,
> assembler, simulator and programmer for Linux.
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
> mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu
>
>

--
A train stops at a train station.  A bus stops at a bus station.
On my desk I have a workstation...

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu