David VanHorn wrote:
>
> At 11:29 AM 5/11/01 -0700, David W. Gulley wrote:
> >On Fri, 11 May 2001, David VanHorn wrote:
> > > I'm getting some anomalous behaviour.
> ><SNIP>
> > > However, later, I commented out panic_a and panic_c.
> > > When I breakpoint, and pull up the trace memory, it shows that I came
> > > through panic_a, which now looks like this:
> > >
> > > (some code)
> > > ;btfss port,bit
> > > ;goto panic_a
> > >
> > > I did re-assemble, reset, and run, and I even tried closing the entire
> > > project and coming back in.
> > > Still, according to the trace, it's getting to the panic code, via panic_a.
> >
> >Just a random thought, but did you comment out the panic_a label?
>
> no, but according to the trace, it's executing the commented line "goto
> panic_a"


David, the IDE doesn't handle stacked (overloaded)
goto labels very well. If you have two labels with
one line of code, (like if you comment-out the code
but leave a label) the MPLAB IDE will decide which
label it will accept for debugging etc.

Have a look at the code in the ROM window, then top
left button of it to select "dissassembly display"
then you can see which of the labels the debugger
has used. I imagine it always uses the first (or last)
label if they are stacked. I don't know which because
I try to avoid stacking labels for exactly the reason
you have now! :o)
-Roman

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads