Scott Dattalo wrote:
>
> ; i=n= 0
>
>      rrf I,w
>      rlf N,f
>
> But that affects the other bits and is probably not acceptable.

Could be: (.0 to .0 or whatever)

        rrf     N,F     ;push .0 out save old Cy inside
        rrf     I,W     ;copy .0 to Cy
        rlf     N,F     ;copy Cy to .0 restore old Cy

Here is no parallel operations at all and for this case
number 3 is seems to be another magical number for PIC ;)

WBR Dmitry.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads