At 09:02 AM 3/19/01 -0500, Drew Vassallo wrote:
>>First, don't use 1 and 0 to indicate whether the result is going into a
>>file
>>register or W.  That's what the W and F constants are for, although you can
>>leave it off and default to F.
>
>I disagree.  But it's just my preference.  Using 1 and 0 is "cleaner" and
>more universal, in the case that someone hasn't used the standard include
>file to define F and W.

Just something to consider here - MPASM recognizes ,F and ,W *without*
requiring them defined to be defined in an include file.  It is built into
the assembler already.

Using those built-in definitions *does* make code that is easier to read -
for me.  And probably for others.

dwayne



Dwayne Reid   <dwayner@planet.eon.net>
Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd    Edmonton, AB, CANADA
(780) 489-3199 voice          (780) 487-6397 fax

Celebrating 17 years of Engineering Innovation (1984 - 2001)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Do NOT send unsolicited commercial email to this email address.
This message neither grants consent to receive unsolicited
commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial email.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics