> Only very small niggle I'd have is the F628 UART tables. I prefer
> the AVR tables, which have a lot more 0% error listings, rather
> than the PIC table which is based on common freqs. Only a small
> point, and of course baud rates can be worked out for any xtal,
> just easier at a glance with AVR tables

It's even easier to have the assembler calculate the baud rate for you.
Check out the UART_BAUD macro in STD.INS.ASPIC, which can be found at
http://www.embedinc.com/pic.


********************************************************************
Olin Lathrop, embedded systems consultant in Littleton Massachusetts
(978) 742-9014, olin@embedinc.com, http://www.embedinc.com

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics