Code portability?  Surely not only work on PIC micros?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Goddard [mailto:dan_goddard@ARMANET.COM]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 12:03 PM
To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Switch / If Statement revisited


Praise the Lord... Amen :)

At 09:02 PM 3/2/01 +1100, you wrote:
>Bob Ammerman wrote:
> >
> > Now I know why I do my PIC development in ASM!
> >
> > Bob Ammerman
> > RAm Systems
> > (contract development of high performance, high function, low-level
> > software)
>
>
>The more months I use PIC asm the more I find I am
>using 5 asm instructions and 25 lines of comments,
>such is the power of a few well placed asm
>instructions. And i'm not a beginner to programming
>either.:o)
>
>Can't see why anyone would use non-asm in a PIC?
>Maybe for really large apps, but then why use a PIC?
>Other controllers are much better for larger apps.
>Maybe my opinion will change but I still think PIC
>C programming is a poor solution.
>-Roman
>
>--
>http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
>mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu

-------------------------------------------
Danny Goddard
Design Engineer
ARMA Design
Tel:(858) 549-2531
Fax:(858) 549-2594
Email: dan_goddard@armanet.com
Web: www.armanet.com



The information contained in this electronic message is private and may
contain privileged, confidential or inside information.  Any distribution,
copying or forwarding or use of this communication by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu