Wow! I missed this feature at first. Just tweak the output when
you have time, and who cares about PWM or saw-tooth waves! :)

 Nikolai

Spehro Pefhany wrote:
>>Roman,
>>I've got a suspicion: that would be conventional PWM, wouldn't it?

> Bob:-

> To me, the unique feature of Walter's suggestion is that it didn't
> have to be called with an exact time between calls. If you started
> making it a sawtooth (a counter or whatever) then you have to start
> worrying about beat frequencies between whatever is going on in
> the software and the period of the sawtooth. Ugh.

> As you say, if you call it regularly at fixed times, it's just a
> software PWM.

> Best regards,


> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..."            "The Journey is the reward"
> speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
> Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
> Contributions invited->The AVR-gcc FAQ is at: http://www.bluecollarlinux.com
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics