> come to think of it, after taking a 2nd look at that statement - i think
it
> really means:
>
>  for (pass=rx_str[ptr1+1]; ptr1<size && pass=1; ptr1++) {

Well, first, you probably meant to say 'pass==1'.

> beacuse we are dealing with a boolean AND, therefore for pass to be 'true'
it
> must equals 1. makes sense?

But now, a numeric or pointer type is treated as true as long as it is
non-zero (non-null for pointers)

Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems
(contract development of high performance, high function, low-level
software)

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu