Hi,
cvasm gives you a much more speed on compilation, a higher level of
abstraction if you can accept and use the pseudo-51 syntax. However, it
does not support macros. Cvasm is smaller than 20k, contrary to MPASM.

Regards,
Imre

On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Simon Nield wrote:

> olin:
> > MAPASM is the assembler provided for free and supported by Microchip.
> Given
> > that, I see the others as irrelevant.
>
>
> bob:
> >Unless you want to develop in an environment other than Windows.
>
>
>
>
> even if you wish to use another OS you may still be able to run mpasm.
>
> it might well work fine under wine on linux/'nix for instance (have not tried it though):
> http://www.winehq.com/about.shtml
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
> email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body
>
>
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu