David Dunn wrote:
>
> I've just discovered that you can't code protect chips you are using a boot loader on.
>
> I'm about to market a product that will be used in a racing application.
>
> There's nothing particularly innovative in the code, but I guess you don't really want anybody sucking the brains out
> of your hard work project.
>
> Question is, do i go for the convienence of easy updates that a bootloader gets you (customer could even do the
> update) OR stay with the security of a code protected, but standard programmed PIC.
>
> Thanks for your ideas on the issue,
>
> David Dunn
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
> email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

You could go for ICSP and reprogram the entire chip on site.

--
Best regards

Tony

mICro's
http://www.picnpoke.com
mailto:sales@picnpoke.com

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu