> >> One drawback of Win2K that Win98 doesn't have is that if you > >> run Dual Head or Twin View display adapters, both screens must > >> run at the same resolution ... bummer. > > This isn't true, in general, for Windows-2000. > > > I just found that info when comparing Matrox Dual Head to > > nVidia Twin View adapters. I _think_ it's true for multiple > > adapters, too, but I'm not sure. > > Maybe it's a restriction of the specific video card(s) or > their drivers. > > I checked a co-worker's system. It's running Windows-2000 > version 5.0.2195 with two displays. Primary display is a > Matrox Millennium G200 AGP at 1280x1024 at 24 bits/pixel. > Secondary display is an S3 ViRGE PCI generating 1024x768 > at 16 bits/pixel. Setup has worked fine for months but it > falls in the "multiple [video] adapters" category. > Thanks for the Info Lee, looks like its the drivers for the Dual Head Cards. Would it be too much to ask if anyone running more than 2 display's has successfully "upgraded" to Win 2000 Regards Chris -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics