>> One drawback of Win2K that Win98 doesn't have is that if you
>> run Dual Head or Twin View display adapters, both screens must
>> run at the same resolution ... bummer.

This isn't true, in general, for Windows-2000.

> I just found that info when comparing Matrox Dual Head to
> nVidia Twin View adapters. I _think_ it's true for multiple
> adapters, too, but I'm not sure.

Maybe it's a restriction of the specific video card(s) or
their drivers.

I checked a co-worker's system.  It's running Windows-2000
version 5.0.2195 with two displays.  Primary display is a
Matrox Millennium G200 AGP at 1280x1024 at 24 bits/pixel.
Secondary display is an S3 ViRGE PCI generating 1024x768
at 16 bits/pixel.  Setup has worked fine for months but it
falls in the "multiple [video] adapters" category.

                                                Lee Jones

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics