At 01:42 AM 11/30/00 +1300, you wrote:
>>Oh and let me guess its not a star :)
>>Its a sat right?
>
>Careful reading will reveal the careful wording did not actually say that it
>WAS a star :-).


EXCEPT of course for the misleading name of the thread.
==========




>And it is true that only one star is expected to be brighter (Sol excluded).
>And I guess it's a satellite by definition - but not a "normal" one.
>AND it's already there.
>BUT it's scheduled to get much brighter real soon with the addition of some
>special decorations.
>
>Look out for it.
>
>
>
>RM
>
>--
>http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
>(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics
>
>
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body