On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:25:47PM -0000, Bond Peter S-petbond1 wrote:
> > Sorry but 164 and 165 are good for parallel-> serial conversion, not
> > serial->parallel.
>
> The 164 data sheet I have in front of me suggests it is perhaps better
> suited for serial in/parallel out operation?
>
Ooops! I'm sorry for confusion. 164 is really good for serial->parallel,
however I prefer 4094 because it combines shift register together with
latch.
--
                        Wojciech Zabolotny
                        http://www.ise.pw.edu.pl/~wzab

http://www.freedos.org  Free DOS for free people!

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body