>
>OK, but after you get the datasheet, use an LF353 or LF412 instead.
>All 3 look very similar, and TL082 looks "identical" to LF353 on the
>d/s, but the LFxxx parts work vastly better at higher frequencies,
>in my experience.

Sometimes that's a minus.
Like my current project, where I have to buffer a 10mV signal cleanly,
while sitting two inches away from an antenna radiating 6W 5mS pulses at
915 MHz.

I had to select for the slowest fet "precision" op-amp in order to supress
the EMI from direct rectification in the chip itself.

Layout already handled, impedances as low as possible....

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
use mailto:listserv@mitvma.mit.edu?body=SET%20PICList%20DIGEST