Maybe there are solutions to this other than measuring the liquid *AFTER* it enters. Could you use a free wheeling positive displacement pump connected to a rotary encoder on the (lower) input as a measuring tool - it should tell you *EXACTLY* how much liquid passes *IN* or *OUT*. Just a *NEW* thought. Bye. > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Shaw [SMTP:andys@SCO.COM] > Sent: Tuesday, 17 October 2000 3:46 > To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU > Subject: Re: [EE]: Help water level > > Thanks Adam, > any advice on which float system to use and where I can get hold of one in > the UK? > > Andy > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "M. Adam Davis" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 3:42 PM > Subject: Re: [EE]: Help water level > > > > Given that it is for a sub, the water shouldn't slosh around all that > much. Why > > not use a float? It is probably a little larger than you want, and > perhaps > > you'd rather have a non-mechanical sensor, but for ease of assembly and > reading > > and simple float setup with a pot or rotary encoder can't be beat. > > > > When you do go to another expiremental method, it would be benificial to > have > > the float working as well so you can compare the readings and improve > your > > design, before getting rid of the float. > > > > -Adam > > > > Andy Shaw wrote: > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > I'm trying to put together some sort of sensor to measure the amount > of > > > water in a model sub ballast tank. The requirements are: > > > 1. Must be small (not a lot of space). > > > 2. Easy to seal against water. > > > 3. Continuous range from say 1 cm to say 30 cm deep, with 1mm > accuracy. > > > 4. Possibly best not to use anything that depends upon pressure (since > this > > > may vary depending upon sub depth). > > > 5. Easy to hook up to a PIC (either digital or analogue OK - I have > both). > > > 6. Cheap! > > > Not asking much! > > > > > > I seem to remember seeing a rain gauge project that used two > (insulated) > > > wires separated by a fixed gap as part pf some sort of oscillator. But > guess > > > what I've lost the mag. Anyone got the details of know if this would > work > > > for me? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different > > > ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different > > ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. > > > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different > ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. > > > -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.