At 23:02 23/09/00 +1200, you wrote:
>> I don't believe that crap about pepsi
>
>TVNZ didn't either until they tried, but Coke paid $50m and they
>are fiercely protective of the territory they've marked out. Like our
>cat is. If "no Pepsi allowed" is stipulated on the ticket (a contract
>document), and they were allowed to make that a condition of
>their sponsorship they'd be within their rights to enforce it.


etc...etc...etc...

it seems to me that by enforcing it they will simply bring media (including
this one) attention to the 'plight' of PEPSI carriers/users......and the
sympothy vote, thus inducing negative thoughts about the power of big
business and specifically Coke...

so IF it is true .. then it looks like a marketing cock up to me....

Graham

-Need *high IP3* AND good N/F ?? try this- http://www.rfham.com

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
"[PIC]:" PIC only "[EE]:" engineering "[OT]:" off topic "[AD]:" ad's