At 06:40 PM 23/09/00 +0100, you wrote: >In message <017f01c02503$b1bf2e80$1bc91440@sciencekit.com>, Bob Ammerman > writes >>Close, but I'm pretty sure the 16C84 was eeprom, not flash based. > >Yes, the 16C84 was EEPROM based, but isn't the 16F84 EEPROM based as >well?. They just changed the name to 'Flash' to compete with other >manufacturers who call their EEPROM products Flash as well!. >-- > >Nigel. Yes, this is correct. Microchip does not have "Flash" anything except by deceit. 16F8xx are all eeprom based and not flash eprom. Atmel and microchip might be trying to blur the lines but some of us care to remember what "flash" is and isn't. -Jim > /--------------------------------------------------------------\ > | Nigel Goodwin | Internet : nigelg@lpilsley.co.uk | > | Lower Pilsley | Web Page : http://www.lpilsley.co.uk | > | Chesterfield | Official site for Shin Ki and New Spirit | > | England | Ju Jitsu | > \--------------------------------------------------------------/ > >-- >http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList >mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu > > > Regards, Jim Robertson NEWFOUND ELECTRONICS Email: newfound@pipeline.com.au http://www.new-elect.com MPLAB compatible PIC programmers. -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu