I'm not 100% sure but I do believe that FLASH != EPROM.

Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems
(contract development of high performance, high function, low-level
software)

----- Original Message -----
From: Nigel Goodwin <nigelg@LPILSLEY.CO.UK>
To: <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [PIC]


> In message <017f01c02503$b1bf2e80$1bc91440@sciencekit.com>, Bob Ammerman
> <RAMMERMAN@PRODIGY.NET> writes
> >Close, but I'm pretty sure the 16C84 was eeprom, not flash based.
>
> Yes, the 16C84 was EEPROM based, but isn't the 16F84 EEPROM based as
> well?. They just changed the name to 'Flash' to compete with other
> manufacturers who call their EEPROM products Flash as well!.
> --
>
> Nigel.
>
>         /--------------------------------------------------------------\
>         | Nigel Goodwin   | Internet : nigelg@lpilsley.co.uk           |
>         | Lower Pilsley   | Web Page : http://www.lpilsley.co.uk       |
>         | Chesterfield    | Official site for Shin Ki and New Spirit   |
>         | England         |                 Ju Jitsu                   |
>         \--------------------------------------------------------------/
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
> mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu